Is Unwanted Touching by My Boss or Coworker Considered Harassment?

is unwanted touching considered harassment

Unwanted touching at work goes beyond being merely “awkward” or “inappropriate.” In Illinois, unwelcome physical contact can qualify as sexual harassment when it changes the conditions of your employment—either because the conduct is severe on its own or because repeated behavior creates a hostile work environment.

The key legal questions focus on whether the touching was unwelcome, whether it seriously interfered with your ability to work, and whether your employer knew—or should have known—about the conduct and failed to act. If you are asking, “Is unwanted touching considered harassment?” the answer is often yes. Early documentation can make a critical difference.

When Is Unwanted Touching Harassment?

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits workplace harassment based on protected characteristics, including sex, race, religion, national origin, age, and disability.

The EEOC defines harassment as unwelcome conduct that becomes unlawful when:

  • Enduring the offensive behavior becomes a condition of continued employment, or
  • The conduct is severe or pervasive enough to create a work environment a reasonable person would find intimidating, hostile, or abusive

What Constitutes Sexual Harassment Under EEOC Guidelines

According to the EEOC, sexual harassment includes:

  • Unwelcome sexual advances
  • Requests for sexual favors
  • Other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature

Sexual harassment becomes illegal when this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects your employment or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.

Illinois Law Provides Stronger Protections Against Unwanted Physical Contact

The Illinois Human Rights Act defines sexual harassment as any unwelcome sexual advance, request for sexual favors, or conduct of a sexual nature when submission affects employment decisions or substantially interferes with work performance.

Illinois law also prohibits harassment based on:

  • Race
  • Color
  • Religion
  • National origin
  • Ancestry
  • Age
  • Sex
  • Marital status
  • Disability
  • Military status
  • Sexual orientation
  • Other protected categories

Stricter Employer Liability Under Illinois Law

Illinois law holds employers strictly liable for harassment committed by supervisors or managers. Employers bear responsibility even when they lacked prior knowledge of the harassment, a standard that provides stronger protection than federal law.

Types of Unwanted Touching That Constitute Harassment

1. Sexually Motivated Touching

Physical contact of a sexual nature most often constitutes harassment, including:

  • Touching intimate body parts without consent
  • Unwelcome hugging, kissing, or caressing
  • Brushing against someone’s body in a sexual manner
  • Blocking someone’s path while making physical contact
  • Forcing physical contact of any kind
  • Groping, fondling, or massaging without consent

Federal courts consistently recognize unwanted physical contact as particularly severe conduct under sexual harassment law. A single incident—especially one involving intimate body parts or violence—can establish a hostile work environment.

2. Non-Sexual Unwelcome Physical Contact

Unwanted physical contact tied to other protected characteristics can also violate the law, including:

  • Aggressive or intimidating contact based on race, religion, or national origin
  • Touching motivated by age discrimination
  • Physical conduct that demeans or degrades someone because of a disability
  • Violent or threatening behavior linked to any protected characteristic

3. Context Determines Legality

Whether touching constitutes harassment depends on several factors:

  • Whether you welcomed or rejected the contact
  • The frequency and severity of the behavior
  • Whether the conduct felt physically threatening or humiliating
  • Whether it interfered with your work performance
  • The relationship between the parties, such as supervisor versus coworker

The central question remains whether the conduct was unwelcome and whether it altered employment conditions or created a hostile environment.

Differentiating Quid Pro Quo and Hostile Work Environment Harassment

Quid Pro Quo Harassment

Quid pro quo harassment occurs when someone conditions employment benefits on submission to unwelcome conduct.

Supervisors typically engage in quid pro quo harassment when they:

  • Demand physical contact in exchange for promotions, raises, or favorable assignments
  • Threaten demotion, termination, or other adverse actions after rejection
  • Base employment decisions on acceptance or refusal of unwanted touching

Tangible employment actions include:

  • Termination
  • Demotion
  • Denial of promotion

Illinois law holds employers strictly responsible for supervisory harassment regardless of whether a tangible employment action occurred.

Hostile Work Environment

Unwanted touching creates a hostile work environment when severe or pervasive conduct creates an abusive atmosphere. These claims typically require:

  • A pattern of unwelcome conduct, unless a single incident is especially severe
  • Conduct that a reasonable person would find offensive
  • Conduct the victim personally found offensive
  • A measurable impact on work performance or workplace conditions

When coworkers engage in harassment, employers face liability if they knew or should have known about the conduct and failed to take prompt corrective action.

Legal Standards for Severity and Pervasiveness

Federal courts apply a flexible standard: the more severe the harassment, the less frequently it must occur to violate the law.

Single-incident cases may suffice when they involve:

  • Sexual assault or attempted assault
  • Violent grabbing or aggressive physical intimidation
  • Nonconsensual touching of intimate body parts

Pattern-of-conduct cases often involve:

  • Repeated unwanted contact with your back, shoulders, or arms
  • Continued touching after you object
  • Ongoing boundary violations

Courts assess severity by examining whether the touching:

  • Involved intimate body parts
  • Included violence or threats
  • Occurred repeatedly
  • Included verbal harassment
  • Exploited power dynamics

Courts also consider whether the victim felt endangered.

When Touching Is Welcome Versus Unwelcome

Physical contact must be unwelcome to qualify as harassment. The clearest way to establish this involves direct communication, such as:

  • “Please don’t touch me.”
  • “I’m uncomfortable with physical contact.”

You do not need to object every time for the conduct to qualify as harassment.

Courts also evaluate context, including:

  • Body language and nonverbal cues
  • Attempts to avoid the harasser
  • Power imbalances that discourage objection
  • Whether the victim reported the conduct

Once you set a boundary—verbally or through clear behavior—continued contact becomes unwelcome harassment.

Employer Liability for Supervisors Versus Coworkers

Harassment by Supervisors

Under federal law, employers face strict liability when a supervisor’s harassment leads to termination, demotion, or other tangible job consequences.

Illinois law goes further by holding employers automatically liable for all supervisory harassment, even without tangible job consequences.

Harassment by Coworkers and Non-Employees

Employers face liability for coworker harassment when they knew or should have known about it and failed to act promptly.

Employers also bear responsibility for harassment by third parties—such as vendors, contractors, or customers—when they control the work environment and fail to address the misconduct.

Documenting Unwanted Touching

Document each incident as soon as possible. Include:

  • Dates, times, and locations
  • Specific details about the physical contact
  • Statements made before, during, and after the incident
  • Your response
  • Names of witnesses
  • The impact on your work and well-being

Keep these records outside workplace systems. Identify witnesses who can support your account. Preserve records of any medical care or counseling related to the harassment.

Your Options for Taking Action

Internal Reporting

Follow your employer’s reporting procedures:

  • Report the conduct to a supervisor unless that person is the harasser
  • Submit a written complaint to HR
  • Confirm verbal reports in writing
  • Request a prompt investigation

Illinois law requires employers to investigate thoroughly and take corrective action when harassment occurs.

Filing with the Illinois Department of Human Rights

File a charge with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR) within 180 days of the discriminatory conduct. The IDHR may order:

  • Back pay
  • Reinstatement
  • Compensatory damages
  • Policy changes
  • Civil penalties

You may also contact the State of Illinois Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Helpline for confidential guidance.

Federal EEOC Complaints

The EEOC may:

  • Investigate and attempt conciliation
  • File a lawsuit on your behalf
  • Issue a right-to-sue letter allowing private litigation

In Illinois, you must file with the EEOC within 300 days.

Private Legal Action

After completing administrative requirements, you may file a lawsuit seeking lost wages, emotional distress damages, punitive damages for intentional misconduct, attorney’s fees, and injunctive relief.

Protect Your Dignity and Workplace Rights

The law does not require you to tolerate unwanted touching. Strong anti-retaliation protections apply when you report harassment.

Contact 1818 today. We represent employees facing workplace harassment, including cases involving unwanted physical contact.

Take decisive action now to protect your rights and hold your employer accountable.

Jordan Matyas - 1818 Founder

Jordan Matyas

LinkedIn | Google

Jordan Matyas is a lawyer, lobbyist, and Founder of 1818 Litigation Attorneys, an Illinois professional licensing defense law firm he created in 2014. With more than 18 years of experience practicing law, he represents clients in a wide range of legal matters, including professional license defense, administrative law, land use and zoning, and state, local, and municipal law.

Jordan received his Juris Doctor from the University of Illinois — Chicago School of Law and is a member of the Illinois Bar Association.